Category: Kung Fu

Evil in Confucianism

Posted on By Appledog

Preface; this is a look at the darkness of the soul at it’s darkest before the light. Said in any other way, in so many words, and you have already made a mistake. Beware for your very souls!

Recently, the Chessman said something on Facebook that hit a little different.

“Blessed Sunday! Studying the 7 deadly sins this week and sloth today. The idea of sloth not just as laziness but as being unfocused and busy at things that don’t matter was a nice insight.”

“As the door turneth upon his hinges, so doth the slothful upon his bed.” (Proverbs 26:14 KJV)

“Be not slothful in business; be fervent in spirit, serving the Lord.” (Romans 12:11 KJV)

The thing is, why is Chessman quoting the bible?

I don’t mean why is he dragging morality into this… I mean, why the Bible and not Confucius?

I really want you to take a moment and see what is going on here. In order to do so you must at least — even only momentarily — attempt to comprehend the massive, blinding influence Confucianism has had on Chinese culture. To the Chinese, Confucianism is life itself — it is survival. Without getting to deep into it, Confucianism as seen as the means by which the Chinese have survived. Those who stray from the path do not make it to the next generation. This reflects strongly on kungfu culture; it is, in fact, the very thing that allows Chinese kungfu quintessentially Chinese and quintessentially Kungfu.

This isn’t a knock on the bible. We here in the West grew up in a Christian country. This affects us in ways we cannot comprehend. However, you can see the approachings of the horizons of it from far away, through careful thought, if you learn your zen meditation.

This got me thinking. What does it mean when it is said, “This generation is evil, and we cannot pass Kungfu down to it.” Whoever the we is — which, incidentally, has come to include me. I know this is a lot to process so let’s take a step back and let me just say that I am of a very low skill level. However, I seem to have entered the door, in some small way.

And even from this vantage point, I can easily see, “This generation is evil, and we cannot pass Kungfu down to it.” But here’s the paradox. Even as I realize this, I realize that I myself am also “evil”, and that is a very large reason why I am of middling to no skill in kung fu.

How did I pass through the door? It’s simple, there is a door, and you simply pass through it. For example, when I met my sifu on the street, I bowed down to my sifu. In the middle of a crosswalk, I saw him driving, so I bowed down on the street. He smiled. Another way, was that when my ‘friend’ did something disrespectful and a senior student had to put him in his place, I stood there and let him yell at me too even though I had nothing to do with it. Another way? I basically failed out of University for not going to my classes, because I was busy practicing kungfu in the park for 4 hours every morning. Yes, I am a sick puppy. Frankly, I had friends in gradeschool but I was also something of a loner or a loser– which was strange, since I seemed otherwise to have led a normal life, with friends, parties and such. But looking back I realize that some of my greatest personality flaws, which were criticized and caused me to become ostracized from most others were my excessive generosity and unwillingness to be abusive to others; my desire to work hard instead of socialize and play; my desire to explore nature and my natural intelligence.

In short, I passed through the door because I wanted to. That’s all. It’s like that line from the neijing tu. “Those who desire to study this will surely achieve something good.” Anyways, after all of this I sort of realize, that evil here is not like what we in the west think of as evil. We are not talking about the devil, or sin per-se. We are talking about a kind of “evil” that “leads to death,” but not necessarily through sin.

Look, let me explain it this way. Let’s go back to the 1970s. Milton Freidman famously argued, “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.” That is true by common sense (and incidentally, by law). Yet what most people do not know about this is that Mr. Freidman was responding to someone. Now we need to go back — back to the future — to the 1950s.

Keith Davis was a major business ethics scholar in the 1950s–1960s, and he did state quite plainly that ethical and socially responsible companies tend to perform better over the long run than immoral ones. He is best known for formulating the Iron Law of Responsibility in 1960: “Those who do not use power responsibly will lose it.” This gave birth to the New American Capitalism — the strategy that dominated world business and finance for the next 100 years.

Business ethics explicitly pays

The idea that a postwar scholar would identify morality as a key driver of success would sound very familiar to a Confucian scholar. In “Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities?” and “Business and Society” was shown the idea that ethical behavior is economically rational; trust reduces transaction costs, reputation attracts customers, employees, and partners, and social legitimacy protects firms from regulation, backlash, and collapse.

Further, he stated the quiet part out loud: Immoral firms tend to destroy their own operating environment. Davis observed that companies acting irresponsibly invite regulation, provoke public backlash, and destabilize the very markets they depend on. This leads to lower long-term profitability, even if short-term gains occur.

The reason thus explained; this is not just an issue of morality, it is an issue of intelligence, wisdom, discipline, and experience. Many people simply do not understand the tradeoff between short term gains and long term profitability. What Davis claimed is a core assumption of Confucianism:

Ethics is not a cost; it is a long-term investment in your very survival.

“A company that acts honestly and responsibly will tend to do better over the long run than one that acts immorally or irresponsibly.”

Now let’s turn back to Confucianism; it’s easy to understand now. Confucianism states that people who take the short-term benefit are evil.

Who is evil?

You are very likely evil, but I’m not really criticizing you. I’m not criticizing anyone. However, there are some events that led up to this epiphany. Last summer some people got banned from some martial arts forums for talking politics. Well, not just talking politics, but spewing vitriol against President Donald Trump. The thing is, you can be a democrat if you want but spewing hatred is spewing hatred. Me? I live in Asia. I’m not a part of the system. I’m just saying, that America has republicans and democrats. I’m not judging that, i’m judging the spewing of hatred. Democracy means you get to vote. Spewing hatred against a political party is not Democracy. It’s anti-democracy because you become so blinded by hate that you do not do the democratic thing and vote the bad guys out — you try to do skirt the system (and the law) by taking short-term action. One of the first steps people engage in is telling lies and spreading propaganda because “the end justifies the means”. This is a common cry and yet it is just as anti-Christian as it is anti-Confucian.

It is in this light that one of my younger kungfu siblings blocked me on social media. Actually, two of them did.

You may find this surprising on many fronts. Let’s just keep it simple: I said that they were posting too many swear words, and spewing too much hatred. They argued with me. I said that they had been misrepresenting facts which were reported in newspapers. They argued with me about that too. But the final straw was when I pointed out they were posting fake AI-generated images to support the previous content. After that, I was blocked. BTW this is iron-clad — the photo was exposed as AI generated by the BBC and once you see the mistakes in the photo the AI made, it is impossible to deny. Yet, they argued with me, and then blocked me. They allowed themselves to become blinded by hatred, they lost the ability to deal with things fairly and rationally, and as a result they excused themselves from our kungfu family. I’ve done nothing to upset anyone. I am not even making a big deal about being their senior, like I am some sort of boss — even the son can criticize the father, if done properly. It’s in the dizi gui. The fact that I am senior is just an uno card that underscores the absurdity of this situation.

Thus, the kungfu cannot be passed down to them. It’s not because they are being punished. It’s not because they can’t learn from Sifu. It’s because they cut themselves off from the truth, from the family, from a source of truth and kungfu — I tell you, I am sure they can learn just as much from me as I could ever learn from them. Now, who will teach them?

The Proof is in the Pudding

Are you a master yet? Are we there yet, pappa smurf?

Let this not be seen as an attack, heaven forbid. But I will say, if this was the only thing I had to mention of their evil, I would not say it. However, the proof is in the pudding. Let’s be honest for a moment. Their kungfu is not good. One of them specializes in therapeutic sit-down qigong for seniors, and another lacks several wude virtues such as min. This is not an attack because it is not unusual. “Min” for example is an extremely hard concept to grasp for Westerners because there is absolutely nothing like it in western culture. To call it “dilligence” is wrong. It is no surprise then that almost every martial artist I have ever met in Canada lacks this basic confucian virtue. Why would they have it? They’re not confucian!

And so, this isn’t an attack, although it will surely be taken as one by the guilty. However, I assure you, they are not “guilty”. You see, “Evil” is the wrong word from a western perspective. A better word would be “not confucian” or “not chinese”. Small c, meaning, informally so. A very hard concept to understand.

Is this the legacy of Wang Ziping?

What have you done? (What have we done? What have you done? What have you done?)

If not you, then who? If not me, then who? If not now, when?

Just go and do it. Walk through the door. No one is stopping you. That’s the story of Wang Ziping just as much as it is the story of the patriarchs. A story filled with hope — emunah — and it is in that light this story should be told; for against all odds, a hope may arise — a star may shine that you may hitch your wagon to it — for all you need is a dream. So go, and dream — for dreams are the highest reality.

Why don’t famous masters post on the forums?

Posted on By Appledog

It was very well documented that back in the earlier days of the internet, in JMA circles some very well respected english-speaking folks posted regularly.  They all left because they became sick of arguing over silly issues with anonymous, inexperienced derps online. –BrendanF

So if I revealed I was a shaolin monk, no one could argue with me without breaking the forum’s rules.

In the the Advanced Study League on KGS, one of the things we learned over many years of running the league is that participation tends to get more rewarded than skill level. This is an emergent property of assigning points to wins. We tried to compensate by adding 1 point for losses vs 2. for wins, but this made it worse, and a guy with a 40% win ratio won one month because he showed up to all of his matches. That’s one issue.

The other is what jks said. “…boards like this have become a niche thing; social media has changed and evolved.” So how did social media change? battle.net general chat (starcraft, barrens general chat, and blizzard forum abuse) literally forced blizzard to make a RealID. Discord was next, and roblox chat. What we learned from usenet is that an unmoderated forum cannot survive. I suspect what we will learn from the modern social media era, by hook or by crook, is that an anonymous forum cannot survive. First, and especially due to AI slop and fakery, an anonymous person has no credibility, not anymore. If you can’t demonstrate your previous history you have no previous history. This was always true but we turned a blind eye to it as an experiment. It didn’t work. Forums which protect anonymity eventually fall into irrelevance. Look around, all of the modern social media platforms are a) moderated b) not really anonymous. ‘doxxing’ is a facet of cancel culture, which is only enabled by the protection of the anonymity of those doxxing. Since anyone can be compelled to reveal the identity of anyone else via court order, who and what exactly do the forum rules protect? Anonymous, inexperienced derps online?  Well, as long as we’re on the same page.

There are other issues. Such as, when moderator actions are enforced they can only be enforced on an anonymous identity. If someone changes their identity they can escape moderator enforcement. This could be solved by tying moderator actions to an ID rather than anonymous profile. I was actually thinking of a kind of real-id system, which would allow you to remain anonymous but also tie you to a particular anonymous profile. Could solve a lot of issues.

Narrative vs. Authenticity

Posted on By Appledog

 

This video is fake.

The Canary in the Coal Mine

Low Level reports, “something is REALLY wrong with bug bounty“. What’s going on, is that people are using AI to find bugs in software and submitting them to “bug bounty” websites operated by computer security researchers. The problem is that the AI is hallucinating code and calls to subroutines, and the bugs don’t actually exist. This is becoming a huge problem as more false reports are now being submitted than real reports, and human beings have to go and check just to make sure the bugs are real in the first place.

  • Narrative: 1. a description of events

As it turns out, I’ve noticed this problem since late 2024 has started to affect online communities that I frequent, such as martial arts discussion boards on the internet.

  • Narrative: 2. the part of a novel that tells the story, rather than the dialogue

The thing is, just like with fake bug bounties trying to get money for nothing, a lot of people (people who should know better) are using AI to talk about martial arts in order to gain social standing by appearing more knowledgeable than they really are. They are trying to tell a story but the dialogue is strangely wrong. There have always been people like this. Greedy people, misrepresenting themselves. But as of now, you can no longer tell the difference because they are using AI to gain knowledge and make video evidence to fool you.

The reason I am able to tell is because I have what is called authenticity. The reason I have authenticity is because I have been actually involved in Tai Chi and Chinese martial arts for a very long time. I can’t be the only one who has noticed this. But i’ve already seen some of the more authentic posters online get duped by fake kungfu videos. Maybe I have even been duped by some really good fakes.

 

Today, already, people are posting AI fakes of themselves doing Kungfu, and it is very difficult to determine that the video is a fake.

It’s not just videos. You should know that right now, today, you are being lied to about Tai Chi and Kungfu. People are trying to make themselves look like they know a lot about Tai Chi and Kungfu online. They lie about how to do Tai Chi and what the basic requirements are about Kungfu. These people do not understand Kungfu, they do not understand the culture, and they have been captured by the milleau. Most likely you don’t even realize how far the wool has been pulled over your eyes already.

The only way to know what is true and authentic, will be to go back to the tradition, back to the lineage, and ask someone authentic to teach you. There is no longer an alternative because it is impossible to determine authenticity online. This was always a problem in the Tai Chi world especially but now it has become so acute that there is no longer a choice in the matter. Either you are part of an authentic tradition or you are not, and if you are not, you are “outside”.  Those who have lineage are now forced to become gatekeepers whether they want to or not. This is it! This is the end. You are either in or out, and the only way to get in is via the door. Only the teacher can show you the door. No Guru devotion, no enlightenment. Period.

  • Narrative: 3. a way of explaining events to illustrate a set of aims or values

Often times, a term which is infrequently used will pop up in a discussion and then suddenly people will begin using the term casually in their posts, or engaging in long, pointless academic discussions making reference to the word. Often using the term in ways it was never intended to be used. The whole thing is a bit weird, but makes sense once you speculate that these people are using AI to analyze threads and try to come up with a credible sounding response. Why? For social standing, of course. Because they want people to think they are better than you. Because they want to attack and demean people with real knowledge, so that they don’t get discredited by the truth. This is an extremely low level of Wu De. Their morals exist only so much as they do not get in the way of their personal success. These are the people most likely to violently attack you because you hold a different belief than they do.

Just Be Authentic?

  • Authenticity: the quality of being true or what somebody claims it is

There’s just one problem with being authentic. How do YOU know whether or not what I am saying is true versus what anyone else out there says is true? If you are new to the world of martial arts (or whatever subject is under discussion) you could easily be fooled by a liar trying to misrepresent himself using ChatGPT. Why should you listen to me? What makes me an authority?

The solution, the only way to fight this problem, is to not fight it at all. The solution is to change the stage on which the game is played.

Authenticity is now a commodity

The golden rule is, “He who has the gold makes the rules.”

This is not a bad thing. It means that the people who make the rules are the people with skin in the game. That’s why paying people works so well to establish credibility; because on the flipside people assume that the money will be used to attract the most credible people possible. This works everywhere, from highly skilled musicians and actors commanding a greater fee, to conventions which hire people from the industry to speak on various topics. If the people weren’t in the industry you could always find someone you didn’t have to pay. However, demand is created by the fact that the people have some knowledge or experience which itself has value. Therefore, the golden rule is the recognition that what we are really valuing is the knowledge and experience of people with skin in the game.

Everyone wants to be enlightened, but no one wants to pay for it.

This is how you chop off someone’s head in zen–ask them how much they would pay to get enlightened. The moment you have to put a cost on it, the fakers all start complaining. Those who are real rush at the opportunity to give you everything they have for the real gold. The real success. The rest, don’t chase it because the perceived value is not worth paying anything at all. Their true nature revealed, they disappear like flash powder. Poof.

None of this relies on any kind of forced behavior. It is just the picture of a healthy community. The problem is our community today is not like this; it is run by people who have not suffered to achieve what they have, but have abused social media to gain followers, mostly for personal gain, without concern for the art.

Confucius writes,「富與貴，是人之所欲也；不以其道得之，不處也。貧與賤，是人之所惡也；不以其道得之，不去也。」

“Wealth and honor are what people desire. If they cannot be obtained in the proper way, do not dwell in them. Poverty and low status are what people dislike. If they cannot be avoided by proper means, do not escape them.”

Mencius comments, “The great man is he who does not lose his childlike heart and puts righteousness above material gain” (Mencius 6A:10)

Confucius also writes,「志士仁人，無求生以害仁，有殺身以成仁。」“The determined person and the man of virtue do not seek to live at the expense of ren (benevolence). They may even sacrifice their lives to preserve ren;” and 「賢哉，回也！一簞食，一瓢飲，在陋巷，人不堪其憂，回也不改其樂。」“How admirable was Yan Hui! Living on a basket of rice and a gourd of water in a shabby alley — others could not endure such hardship, but Hui never let go of his joy.”

Mencius comments,「富貴不能淫，貧賤不能移，威武不能屈，此之謂大丈夫。」“Wealth and honor cannot corrupt him, poverty and lowliness cannot make him waver, power and force cannot bend him — this is what it means to be a great man.”

What is the meaning here?

Emperor Wen wore simple clothing, reduced palace expenses, and refused the construction of an expensive tomb. He dealt with matters of state in person and was deeply involved in governing using the principles of Ren and Li. Regarding Ren and Yi (Kindness and Justice), he reduced taxes, lightened punishments, and released prisoners. He also avoided un-necessary wars, choosing instead diplomacy and restraint. He expanded Han control through trade and business. This was a time known as the Rule of Wen and Jing (Jing was his son), a golden age of peace and prosperity in the early Western Han, directly attributed to his moral leadership.

Zhu Xi writes in commentary,

“To use the art of war properly, one must first have virtuous leadership, for the soldiers will follow the general’s character.”
— Zhu Xi, Commentary on the “Art of War”

“To be a leader, one must first cultivate one’s virtue. If one does not cultivate one’s virtue, how can one lead others? A leader who has virtue will guide others with ease, for virtue leads to harmony.”
— Zhu Xi, Commentary on The Doctrine of the Mean

The Next Generation

TO create a new society, to teach the next generation, one must be of the previous generation. Outsiders cannot come in and make changes. How could they? They are from a different system, a different style. If you are not a part of the lineage, how can you continue the lineage?

Even those with the best of intentions must first accept the truth. Only by accepting the truth can one understand what must be done next. Or else it is like swimming in the dark.

Lord Ye and the Dragon

葉公好龍，為之雕牆，畫龍、繪龍於屋；堂前柱上，刻龍也。真龍知而下之，葉公見之，棄而走。

“Lord Ye loved dragons. He had dragons carved on his walls, painted on his screens, and embroidered in his curtains. When the real dragon in Heaven heard of this, it was moved and came down to visit. But when Lord Ye saw the real dragon, he panicked and ran away.” (From: New Anecdotes of the Talk of the World by Liu Xiang (劉向) during the Han dynasty.)

The Decreasing Relevance of Online Forums

Posted on By Appledog

When I first began reading and posting on rec.martial-arts in the early 1990s, I saw online forums as a way for martial artists to explore and make sense of Chinese martial arts paradigms, and to connect with like-minded people. I didn’t expect to encounter so many people disillusioned with kung fu itself and who had “moved on” to other things.

As Usenet faded, I moved to other forums: Empty Flower, the Yang Family Tai Chi forum, Kung Fu Magazine forum, and more recently, MartialTalk. Although, I spent the most time on Rumsoaked Fist. There is a lot of good information posted there. Also a lot of garbage. Mostly garbage, by people who are pretending. But in comparison to rec.martial-arts, it’s a goldmine. However by late 2024, things began to change. I couldn’t believe my own eyes, but it became clear to me that AI tools like ChatGPT were being used to fake expertise in arts like Tai Chi. For me this was the last straw.

Of course, there have always been people who pretended to be good at Tai Chi or who misrepresented their martial art as Tai Chi in order to make money. But in this new era, misinformation wa louder, more confident, and more often wrong. Unlike before when people were earnestly trying to understand Tai Chi, today’s voices declare how it works, often contradicting one another. I believe it represents a generational shift. Something fundamental has changed in the community.

Back in the ‘70s and ‘80s, the Kung Fu craze left many disappointed due to a lack of authentic training, which eventually led to the rise of MMA. Many of those disillusioned students became today’s kung-fu skeptics and Chi-deniers. But the Tai Chi generation that followed had its own failure—those who practiced Tai Chi without believing or understanding Chi. This opened the door to distorted theories and false lineages. Groups like Taoist Tai Chi and modern push hands competitors, who often practice something that’s not really Tai Chi at all, are the fruits of what happened, not the cause. I don’t blame them, I pity them.

Today, that confusion is deeper than ever. Fundamental misunderstandings like equating wu wei with passivity, or mistaking mental void for meditation are promoted as wisdom. And forums I once respected have become irrelevant, either inactive or filled with misinformation. Often, the loudest voices are from people practicing something else entirely. Usually someone claiming MMA, hard weight training, or some other valid practice like Reiki, Feldenkrais or Wim Hof trying to pass themselves off as a Tai Chi expert. That’s not to dismiss a other arts; it’s just that Yoga isn’t Tai Chi, and vice versa.

Yes, we all know “fighting matters.” But not every school trains the same way. And now, many who spent decades on a misguided path are realizing they’ve come up empty and they’re looking for someone to blame. The truth? They were told. I was told by my sifu. So why weren’t others? The painful answer is: they were. But they didn’t listen. And today, the people who didn’t listen are the new experts. I fear that this is the last generational mistake before the end. When today’s MMA and progressive weightlifting crowd realizes they’ve failed (give them another 5-10 years) there will be nowhere left for them to turn.

Ultimately, the failure arises out of a lack of Wu De. Wu De is not “being a good person”. It is the code underwriting the internal arts. This is why it is said that the civil must be together with the martial, and it is why it is said that one needs a high level of wu de to learn high level martial arts.

If you care about Tai Chi Kung Fu, and you recognize the importance of Wu De, you will need to study it in order to learn about it. The answer is found in the four books.

There are many sets of “four books”. One is commonly called the Tai Chi classics. I don’t mean that, although you must also read them to understand Tai Chi in general.

I also do not mean just the Tao Te Ching, I Ching, Huangdi Neijing, and Transmission of the Lamp (for which the Blue Cliff Record can substitute in a pinch). Those are excellent books which you must also read in order to get a grounding in the Chinese philosophy which underpins the internal arts. Many people will say that one or more of these books are “must-reads”. Well, sure, they all have great things you can learn which will help your Tai Chi. But they do not teach Wu De.

The four books you are missing, the ones which are really important, are the four books that define Wu De. I’m talking about the Four Books that begin with the Da Xue (Great Learning). This is not Wu De from a dry, critical academic standpoint. It is Wu De in practice, it is practical, and it will directly inform your training.

The Wu De of mǐn (敏): Diligence

Posted on By Appledog

王曰。吾惛、不能進於是矣。願夫子輔吾志、明以教我。我雖不敏、請嘗試之。
The king said: “I am dull-witted, and unable to carry this out. Please help me clarify my will by instructing me. Even though I am not so sharp, I will try to do it.”
(Mencius 1a:7)

Thus we see that mǐn refers to mental diligence (acuity) applied to diligence in undertaking.

子曰：「我非生而知之者，好古，敏以求之者也。」
“Master Kong said: I am not one who was born with knowledge; I love ancient [teaching] and earnestly seek it.” (Analects 7:20)

「道在邇，而求諸遠；事在易，而求諸難。」
“The Way is near, but men seek it afar. It is in easy things, but men seek for it in difficult things. If everyone were to love their relatives and respect their elders, the world would be at peace.” (Mencius 4a:11)

“Therefore it is said, ‘Seek and you will find it; neglect and you will lose it.'” (6a:11)

Mencius means that in the approach of learning, special diligence must be used. Not just the diligence of repeated action, but the diligence of thought. The phrase ‘the way is near, but men seek it afar’ may remind you of a common saying among martial artists regarding those who ‘seek the far but avoid the near’.

Muken no Ken

The story of 無劍の剣 or “The Sword of No Sword” is a story from the life and teachings of Takuan Sōhō.

A young samurai came to a master and asked to be taught the ultimate technique of swordsmanship.

He expected to learn mystical techniques, secret styles, or hidden scrolls of killing. But instead, the master told him to sweep the dojo, fetch water, tend the garden, and watch the clouds.

Days turned to weeks. No sword training.

Eventually the student grew impatient: “Master, I came to learn swordsmanship, not to be your servant.”

The master replied: “You seek the sword in distant things — death, glory, technique — but have not yet mastered the sword of the self. The Way is in the sweeping.”

Seeking the Near

A common mistake among modern martial artists is said to be “reaching for the far but avoiding the near”. This is often taken to mean a lack of physical diligence (勤 qín), but it really just means their minds are elsewhere (i.e. a lack of mǐn). Mǐn is not the same as qín, although they are both forms of diligence. If you have ever heard the phrase “You must put your mind into your movements,” this is the meaning. Tai Chi is a form of moving meditation. You must carefully pay attention to your movements, not to random thoughts or things outside.

In Chinese martial circles, you might hear:

勤能補拙，敏能補慢。
Diligence can make up for clumsiness; agility can make up for slowness.

Qín is consistent effort over time. The ability to show up, rain or shine, and keep training even when progress is slow or invisible. It’s about building the foundation—stances, breathwork, forms, repetition. This is assumed. It’s the mǐn which is the virtue.

Doing the same Silk Reeling or Zhan Zhuang (standing post) daily for years is qín. Practicing calligraphy strokes repeatedly in Confucian study is qín. Memorizing and reciting classical texts by heart is qín. But if one doesn’t deeply consider the meaning of the words, there is a lack of min. Therefore a junzi (君子, gentleman) has both qin (physical diligence) to walk the long road of virtue and knowledge, and mǐn (mental diligence) to respond to life’s changes with wisdom and action.

Martial Mindfulness

The Meaning of mǐn originally is mindfulness. In modern Chinese it appears in words like敏捷 (mǐnjié): agility, 聰敏 (cōngmǐn): clever, quick-witted and 靈敏 (língmǐn): sensitive, perceptive.

「君子欲訥於言而敏於行。」
“The gentleman is slow to speak, but quick in action.” (Analects 1:14)

Zhu Xi comments, “Being careful in speech means not daring to exhaust what one has in excess.”

This shows us the idea of mǐn as a kind of moral responsiveness; a readiness to act when the situation is understood. It’s not rashness, but clarity in action once discernment is complete. This is a kind of quick-thinking without hesitation. During combat it refers to the ability to respond appropriately without needing to mechanically analyze the situation.

“心靜則身敏。”
“When the mind is calm, the body is responsive.”

Mindful stillness enables mǐn.

From Chen Changxing’s 10 points

Be still and calm in both body and mind; even, smooth, and unconcerned – motionless.

Attack as if you were on fire, but if you do not listen you will issue too late.

There is no time to ponder or hesitate, sincerity and spontaneity bring the correct result.

Jin (strength/skill) accumulates day by day, training for a long period of time will bring accomplishment; be persistent in practice and you will understand the method. Training for a long time will bring knowledge, study the underlying principle to understand; ability leads to achievement – this is easy to understand. To advance take one step at a time, be patient, and follow the proper training sequence.

A Story from Yang Chengfu

Master Yang Cheng-Fu, famed for soft and round Tai Chi, was once demonstrating push hands. A student tried to shove him, and Yang stepped aside without tension, lightly redirecting the student’s force. The student fell. When asked how he responded so quickly, he said:

“I do not respond quickly. I listen deeply. The movement happens before my mind decides.” —Yang Cheng-Fu

The importance of min (placing one’s mind in the movements) is not just a virtue but a vital requirement of the martial arts.

Wei Wu Wei

This is a close equivalent to the Taoist concept of Wei Wu Wei. In Chinese martial arts such as Tai Chi, mǐn serves as the underpinning of many skills.
If you are 感覺快 (gǎnjué kuài) you are “quick sensing”. You feel the opponent’s intent through contact (ting jin).
If you have 反應快 (fǎnyìng kuài) you have quick responses. You respond appropriately, not mechanically, but with precision.
This creates 適時快 (shìshí kuài) — timely execution. It is the speed of mǐn, not necessarily the physical speed, which is limited. Yet mental speed can be faster than a flash of lightning.

One Thousand

拳打千遍，其義自見。
“Practice a form a thousand times, and its meaning will reveal itself.”

If one does not have mǐn, one may use qín to gain some understanding. Then one can meditate on the movements. Then the meaning can become instinctive.

Ten Thousand

Chen Xin and his brother learned Taijiquan from their father. At nineteen, Chen Xin entered a martial arts school and practiced Taijiquan ten thousand times a year for twenty years, achieving profound skill. Despite his short stature, he was highly skilled in martial arts, once defeating six or seven county guards in a fight.
One may ask why he practiced so hard? Well as it turns out, Chen Xin’s elder brother, Chen Yao, had also began practicing his boxing forms ten thousand times annually. Despite his modest stature, Chen Yao’s skill was such that he could reportedly throw multiple opponents simultaneously.

Yang Shou-Chung reportedly did his forms 30 times per day, starting at age 7 or 8.

Xie Bingcan (謝炳燦) practiced the Yang long form more than ten times a day for many years, often sleeping only three or four hours per night.

Wang Hai-Jun started his Tai Chi journey at the age of nine. Wang Hai-Jun moved to Chen Village to study under Grandmaster Chen Zhenglei. His daily routine included training a minimum of six hours a day. Because he had to go to school he would wake up early and train from 5:00 to 7:30 a.m., then resuming practice after school for two hours, often adding another two hours in the evening.

Wang Ju-Rong was known to practice for a minimum of six hours every day. Wang Ziping practiced for two hours every morning and evening in addition to his daily teaching commitments.

Feng Zhi-Qiang was known to practice for seven hours in the morning every day, from 4am to 11am.

Chen Fa-Ke was known to be constantly practicing silk reeling movements wherever he was, and was known to have practiced the form for thirty times every day.

 

Special Eyes

手快不如心快，心快不如眼快。
“Fast hands are not as good as a fast mind; a fast mind is not as good as fast eyes.”

There are different kinds of speed:
• 手快 (shǒu kuài) – physical speed,
• 心快 (xīn kuài) – mental readiness
• 眼快 (yǎn kuài) – perceptual awareness

This is the nature of mǐn.

Attaining Min requires Qin (Dilligence) and Xin (Faithfulness)

There is a saying from Chen Village I can share with you.

「不怕慢，就怕站。」
“Don’t be afraid of moving slowly, only be afraid of standing still.”

At face value, màn means slow and zhàn means to stand still, or to stagnate. The saying is encouraging you to keep practicing, even if progress feels slow. What you should fear is inaction, or giving up. This relates to inner progress, not just outer speed. Here, slow movement is “progress”, however slow! And standing still means stagnation. This saying encourages consistency over speed.

With regards to mǐn, you cannot gain mǐn instantly. It develops from long, slow, intentional practice. Sensitivity, timing, and responsiveness are the hallmarks of mǐn and grow not from rushing, but from cultivating precision, clarity, and awareness.
So even if you train slowly, you’re feeding the roots of mǐn. But if you stop training altogether, you sever those roots.

Criticizing Others

Let us not forget “Quick in action, but cautious in speech.” (Analects 1:14).

“The noble person is concerned with their own character. The petty person is concerned with the faults of others.” (Analects 15:21)

In Confucian usage, mindfulness refers to mental alertness, attentiveness to what matters, responsive clarity, and diligent focus on one’s self-cultivation and the self-cultivation of others. Therefore one of the worst things you can do in a discussion is say anything disparaging to another human being.

Rushing to judge others without deep understanding is a failure of mǐn (awareness). It is commonly said, “Judge not, lest ye be judged” and “If you must judge, judge silently — and judge yourself first.”

Common mistakes:
• Attacking somoene personally because you cannot respond to their statement
• To berate beginners for not being of a high standard
• Any blunt criticism of a style or it’s principles simply because your style is different

One should strive to engage with others in a respectful way using measured (mindful) speech. Do not mock others or demonstrate a lack of your own self-cultivation. Showing anger, frivolous uncaring, or distaste to another human being shows that one’s mind is not clear and that one lacks mǐn (thoughtfulness).

Proper Criticism

Proper criticism must always be rooted in the desire to help others. If your goal is not to help someone but to humiliate them, or just pure criticism with no solution (i.e. bashing somene or berating them) then it shows your criticism is not based on mǐn (understanding).

Receiving Criticism

“The Master said, ‘If I examine myself and find that I am not upright, even a simple villager can criticize me; but if I examine myself and find that I am upright, I will not be troubled by others’ criticisms.'” (Analects 7:3)

“The Master said, ‘When you see someone of worth, think of how you may equal them. When you see someone unworthy, examine yourself.'”​ (Analects 4:17)

“The Master said, ‘The gentleman seeks virtue in himself; the small man seeks virtue in others.'” (Analects 15:21)

Mǐn involves remaining diligently attentive to your self-cultivation. Engaging in criticism of others without self-reflection will show a lack of awareness of self. Therefore the first step is, no matter how ridiculous, anti-social, or unwarranted the criticism was, does it contain any grain of truth that you can use to aid in your own cultivation?

In Confucian thought, the emphasis is on internal virtue and self-improvement. Therefore, unwarranted criticism of others can be seen as a diversion from one’s own moral responsibilities, reflecting a deficiency in the diligent application of mǐn.​ If you find another’s criticism is unwarranted, you now have a golden opportunity not to criticize that person in return, but to either respond calmly, demonstrating the virtue of min, or to not respond at all.

Taiji Ten Ten

Posted on By Appledog

Taiji Ten Ten

  1. The energy at the top of the head should be light and sensitive
  2. Sink the chest and raise the back
  3. Remains relax with no tensions
  4. Distinguish full from empty
  5. Sink the shoulders and drop the elbows
  6. Use the mind and not strength
  7. Unite the upper and lower body
  8. Unite internal and external
  9. Continuity without interruption
  10. Seek Stillness in movement

1. The head should be upright so the shen (spirit) can reach the headtop.
This is informed by the 8 channel exercise, esp. fire channel and water channel.

2. Sink the chest and pluck up the back.
This is informed by the 8 channel exercize, esp. lung channel.

3. Sung (relax) the waist.
This is informed by the 8 channel exercise, esp. dai channel.

4. Differentiate insubstantial and substantial.
This is informed by the 8 channel exercise, esp, small channel exercise — but also by many others such as taming the tiger.

5. Sink the shoulders and elbows.
This is informed by the 8 channel exercise, but also by many others such as 9 movements of chen style foundation.

6. Use mind and not force.
This is informed by the 8 channel exercise, but also by standing or in brush knee fa li exercise.

7. Upper and lower mutually follow.
This is informed by many but press elbow exercise and single whip/an are good canidates.

8. Inside and outside coordinate.
This is informed by many but especially combined whirl arms exercise.

9. It is mutually joined and unbroken.
This is especially informed by silk reeling jibengong.

10. Seek stillness in movement.
This is informed by many exercises; it has multiple meanings. it could be informed by combined whirl arms, or standing. One aspect is sinking in transition.

Principles vs. Techniques

Posted on By Appledog
Tai Chi and Qigong, as well as all Chinese martial arts, begin training by copying and repeating techniques. Over time, these techniques become internalized and yield what is known as “gong” — the same word as “gong fu” (kung fu). This kung fu is the ability to express the principles of the art physically with your body.
The biggest mistake beginners make is to focus on the art intellectually and to try and understand or rationalize the principles of the art before being able to express them. It is good to understand what the principles are as a roadmap but no amount of “understanding” makes up for “perception”. It can also cause problems if there is a mistake in understanding because the student will miss or resist the correct training results later.

“If you want what I have, then do what I do.”

This teaching is easy to understand and easy to follow. The teacher says, “If you want what I have, then do what I do.” You must copy the teacher’s techniques diligently, precisely and accurately, trust the teacher and be patient to achieve results. This is difficult to understand in the beginning because it can take years to achieve results. So you must find a teacher who is both knowledgeable and virtuous in his conduct and you must follow him for as long as you can.

Tao Te Ching Chapter 36 Commentary

Posted on By Appledog

Bend before breaking,
Weigh before bending,
Enter before Weighing,
and don’t think about seizing;
It’s a subtle insight,
four ounces defeat a thousand pounds.

Like a fish hidden in deep waters,
the final chapter needs not be revealed.

–(Tao Te Ching Chapter 36)

All famous translations I have checked seem to botch this chapter. They give a direct translation, which disjoints the first and second parts of the chapter. Examples abound; Leary, DT Suzuki, Leggae, Lin Yutang, even Red Pine, none of them seem to understand the author’s intention is to convey what the subtle insight is to the reader.

Spoiler alert, the subtle insight is not “the weak defeats the strong”. That is, rather, an effect — or, enabled by — the understanding and application of the subtle insight.

For example, which translation explains the nature of the imagery of the fish in a deep pool of water (not merely in “a pool of water”, but a “deep pool”)? It is like water moved by an unseen fish; the fish cannot leave the pool, but nonetheless it’s effect is seen from outside. I think catching that fish goes a great way towards making a meal out of the subtle insight of Chapter 36. Another harmonious proverb is the story of the doctor who treats people before they get sick.

Here I have rewritten the chapter to apply to traditional martial arts such as Tai Chi, or Aikido, in an attempt to point out this “subtle insight.”

Tao Te Ching Chapter 10 Commentary

Posted on By Appledog

Tai Chi Test!

Instructions: Read and answer the questions. The test begins at 5am and you must turn in your papers between 7am and 7:30am. You must answer all questions fully and you may not leave before the allotted time.

  1. Carrying body and soul and embracing the one, can you avoid separation?
  2. Attending fully and becoming supple, can you be as a newborn babe?
  3. Washing and cleansing the primal vision, can you be without stain?
  4. Loving all men and ruling the country, can you be without cleverness?
  5. Opening and closing the gates of heaven, can you play the role of woman?
  6. Understanding and being open to all things, are you able to do nothing?
  7. Giving birth and nourishing, bearing yet not possessing, working yet not taking credit, leading yet not dominating, this is the primal virtue.

Answer Section

Wait a moment. Number seven isn’t a question! Ahh, so that’s why we have to read them all first. The answer is hidden in the test questions.

So let’s see, what did Sifu teach me? Think back. What would Sifu say about this?

1. In Wuji posture, avoid separation, i.e. into yin and yang. This means relax everything. So you don’t have weight on one leg or another; you don’t have tension in one shoulder or another, both hands are equally relaxed. There is no preference or readiness in your posture, no idea informing directionality. It’s just a relaxation posture.

2. We can let go of our shape, and become like a newborn babe. This will allow us to more easily observe the small. Similar to No. 1.

3. The primal vision is probably the vision which can see the primal unity. It must be without stain. One may not be tired, and one must avoid alcohol, smoking, even coffee and sugar. In our modern life we are simply not as relaxed as in prior generations. So we must take special care to relax and fang song.

4. Trying to win, or trying to impose your will (like, applying a technique) can end up hurting people. Therefore it is better to follow than to lead.

5. In utilization (opening and closing) this would mean in use. We could consider form or push hands. Playing the role of woman is the “asking hand”, the 試應手 (shi4 ying4 shou3); “yose-miru”, or (sorry, wrong word) “yosu-mi”, in Japanese. It is a term from the game of Go (Wei-qi). So instead of initiating upon touch, play the role of the receiver. Ex. in push hands one must play the follower. These are good first steps.

6. Once you have ingrained all eight directions, do not intend to follow any one of them, but allow the direction to emerge on it’s own.

7. It is said then, that it must be flowing and continuous, without breaks, stops or starts. But if this is forced, it is not the best way. For example if one moves in a straight line it is surely because one has overlaid their own mental imagery over their body, placing it into subjugation by the will of the mind, instead of following the natural surroundings.

Overall, we should pay special attention to the principle of mercy and not the principle of cruelness. Be grateful and stand before the teacher and wait, with attention, smile and listen! This way is easier to learn more. Thus only those with good morals will achieve success.